Tuesday, February 25, 2020

Transformational Leadership and how used in the hospitality industry Essay

Transformational Leadership and how used in the hospitality industry can increase profitablity - Essay Example chniques of good listening, hones and open communication, delegating, conflict resolution skills, etc.,† It is generally accept that good leadership is essential to the functioning of an organization. Organizations are constantly seeking leaders with a set of skills at all levels, which can inspire team members to achieve goals and earn the loyalty of customers. Leadership is the process of interaction between situations among team members. Thus, an effective leadership is contingent upon a number of variables, such as trait, leading styles, communications skills, conflict resolutions, and be able to motivate team members. Every team member also has a responsibility that specifies his or her involvement. Teams are set forth to establish roles to accomplish common goals. All team members should have a clear idea of their own roles, own duties, and responsibilities in the team and have a good understanding of how they contribute to achieve the team’s goal. The role given to every single member of the team should reveal their individual strengths as much as possible to maximize each member’s contribute to the fulfilment of the team’s objectives (Bass& Riggio 2005 p45). It is important that the abilities and skills of the employees must have to be brought out in order to fully perform in their duties and obligations in the workplace. The more proficient the member the success of the team is also ensured. A team member is usually chosen based on their expertise, qualities, and what he or she can provide for the team. Therefore, an effective leader should understand his or her team memb er’s strengths and weakness to properly assigned tasks. Transformational leadership is a very important present-day theory of leadership. This leadership style is effective for successful organizational change management. Burns believed that all behaviour regarding leadership is transactional or transformational in nature. Transactional behaviours are "mainly oriented for

Saturday, February 8, 2020

Case Briefs Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Case Briefs - Assignment Example In 1976, the plaintiff took the case to a district court in Michigan State. In 1979, the Michigan’s district court dismissed the case in favor of the defendant Here’s Johnny Portable Toilets Inc. As an appellant, Carson appealed at the US Court of Appeals in Michigan State. The case was finally decided under the Michigan Court of Appeals 6th Circuit in 1983 (Smith, 21). In the district court, the plaintiff claimed that use of the phrase â€Å"Here’s Johnny† by the defendant amounted to violation of fair competition laws and invasion of privacy rights by the defendant. At the Courts of Appeals, the appellant maintained that use of the phrase in the defendant’s business amounted to unfair competition, invasion of privacy rights and invasion of right of publicity. The district court dismissed the case because the plaintiff failed to prove that use of the phrase by the defendant meets likelihood of confusion standards. The Courts of Appeals restrained the defendant, Here’s Johnny Portable Toilets Inc., from further use of the phrase â€Å"Here’s Johnny.† The district court reasoned that under Michigan common law, there was no likelihood of confusion among consumers of Here’s Johnny Portable Toilets Inc. and those of Carson’s apparel businesses. However, the Courts of Appeals reasoned that publicity rights belongs entirely to John Carson, and cannot be duplicated by third parties (Smith, 23). The Defendant, Time Warner, Inc. released digital formats of artists’ sound recordings through the internet. The online digital content generated substantial revenues, which were allegedly distributed to artists and assignees in a subjective manner. The Plaintiff, Tony Silvester et al, sued to recover compensation and damages resulting from breach of contract between the artists and the recording companies. The case was first brought to the US District Court of Southern New York in June 2000. After dismissal by the court in June 2002,